Featured article:
September 19, 2016 | Claire Doffegnies, Journals Development Coordinator

Peer review in pictures: opening up the black box

The term ‘black box’ often comes up in the discussion around peer review. It seems that sometimes, it isn’t always clear to authors who and what exactly is involved in the process, and how much work it actually takes. Our recent white paper, Peer review: a global view, showed a discrepancy between researchers’ expectation and the reality of how long it takes to review a paper, which may be a symptom of this. So, we’ve put together a handy graphic to shed light on the steps involved in the process – help us open up the black box and share this with the researchers publishing in your journal.
Featured video:
Featured video
Watch and listen...
Top five articles:

Altmetrics Last week’s top five Taylor & Francis Online articles (recorded by Altmetric).

Recent articles:
  • October 3, 2016 | Lucy Francis, Editorial Office Team Leader

    The Peer Review Systems Helpdesk

    The process of peer review via an online submission system such as ScholarOne Manuscripts or Editorial Manager often generates queries, and you may not always be able to answer these yourself. Taylor & Francis have a dedicated Peer Review Systems (PRS) Helpdesk to help you.
  • September 23, 2016 | Imogen Clarke, Development Editor

    Guidelines for reviewing a quantitative research paper

    Papers reporting quantitative research may be drawing on a wide variety of data, from temperature readings to survey responses. It is important for the reviewer to judge, to the best of their abilities, if the data are reported accurately and if they support the conclusions drawn.
  • September 22, 2016 | Imogen Clarke, Development Editor

    Peer Review Week: catch up on our peer review Twitter discussion

    Did you catch our peer review chat on Twitter? Our panel of editors joined us from Argentina, Puerto Rico and the UK, taking a rare opportunity to share peer review expertise across regions and disciplines. And joining us from the Taylor & Francis team who manage the systems that facilitate peer review on our journals, we had Gareth and Lucy offering up valuable advice. Our Storify of the event contains peer review tips and insights for editors, reviewers and authors.
  • September 22, 2016 | Imogen Clarke , Journal Development Editor

    Guidelines for reviewing a clinical research paper

    Clinical trials describe the methodology, implementation and results of controlled studies, usually undertaken with large patient groups. These trials are used to test whether a treatment is safe and effective, and their accurate reporting is essential to clinical research and practice. The reviewer plays a crucial role in the process, ensuring that published articles contain reliable and ethically sound research and analysis.