Featured article:
June 15, 2016 | Scott Yearsley, Managing Editor

10 ways to develop your journal

Editors already play a crucial role in journal development; they send signals to the readership through their selection of papers and appointment of board members, for example. But the pace of change in the world of journals is immense, and there are a number of other strategies that an editor can employ. The following are just a few ideas for you to consider.
Featured video:
Featured video
Watch and listen...
Top five articles:

Altmetrics Last week’s top five Taylor & Francis Online articles (recorded by Altmetric).

Recent articles:
  • June 13, 2016 | David Trafimow, Editor, Basic and Applied Social Psychology

    The demise of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing: a personal view

    From David Trafimow, Editor, Basic and Applied Social Psychology

    In 2015, the Editor of Basic and Applied Social Psychology announced in an editorial that the journal would cease accepting papers that relied on certain statistical methods – especially the null hypothesis significance testing procedure (NHSTP) – with immediate effect. The editorial went far and wide, sparking a great deal of (mixed) attention within the scholarly community. Tweets were written, blog posts were shared, and publications including Scientific American and the Economist debated the matter. How has the editorial influenced scientific practice? How have submissions to the journal changed? What’s been the reaction to the editor? David Trafimow discusses his decision, and recounts his personal experiences and views over one year down the line.
  • June 6, 2016 | Gareth Meager, Editorial Systems Manager

    DMARC email sending policy and how this affects your journal

    Changes to email ‘from’ addresses in peer review systems

    The peer review systems widely used at Taylor & Francis - both Editorial Manager and ScholarOne Manuscripts – typically operate by sending emails and alerts from the system as if sent by a named user, where the from address and the @server.com details do not match. This is known as ‘spoofing’. In legitimate use, spoofing acts as a good way to send emails from within an organization’s server (in this case the peer review systems) but appear to the outside world to be from another person. The ‘from’ address may appear as “person@university.com” even though the actual domain of the sending server is something else, such as “email@peerreviewsystem.com”. This is the core of DMARC policy, and email providers are now checking to make sure these two domains (the ‘from’ address and the sending server) match so that spammers are not able to ‘spoof’ genuine email as a means to appear more trustworthy.
  • May 31, 2016 | Becca Bray, OA Marketing Executive

    Open access: what are the opportunities for marketing and publicity?

    Marketing open access (OA) journals and articles offers a huge amount of opportunities to maximize the visibility of research, not only within academia but also beyond. Becca Bray, OA Marketing Executive at Taylor & Francis, gives an insight into the impact publishing OA can have, with real life examples to inspire and inform.
  • May 24, 2016 | Becca Bray, OA Marketing Executive

    The role of marketing in open access

    Applying tactics and channels to journal articles

    What is the role of marketing in open access (OA) publishing? How are marketing tactics and channels applied to individual journal articles and on specific journals? With OA meaning an individual piece of research has the potential to be read by anyone, our OA Marketing Executive, Becca Bray, lifts the lid on the many and varied ways the team works to maximize the number of people reading.